SOLVER PROOF / DISCRETE MODEL

Compare the coordination solver under matched conditions.

Compare individual routes and Rovnou coordination in a discrete model using 20 AMRs. This demonstrates solver behavior—not heterogeneous integration, safety control, or live warehouse throughput.

Identical starts and task-generation seed on both sidesHeading-aware actions generated in your browserScrub back to compare any moment

0/0

Generating comparison conditions

Site pattern

all 0 AMRs have long transfers · 0×0 grid · shareable random placement #0

Batch-assign seeded long pickup-to-delivery work to free AMRs with directed distance and observe 160 ticks.

Layout: A demo-scale adaptation of the shelf and aisle structure in public MAPF benchmark warehouse-10-20-10-2-1.map (not a real facility drawing)

View layout source

Choose a site pattern

Start with 20 AMRs in a warehouse, then try a corridor, intersection, or staging area

Replay both plans

Track each AMR's heading, turns, and replayed route

Compare completion and turns

Review action steps and 90-degree turns at the end

NEXT STEP

Next, define automation options and ROI conditions for your warehouse

The demo shows solver behavior only. Next, use process, volume, labor, and investment conditions to define AMR-inclusive equipment options and delivery scope.

Equipment, integration, and responsibilities are confirmed per project

Request an automation review